Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia
Emergency Prevention and Response Plan for Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia
National Park System Units and the Grand Portage Indian Reservation within the Lake Superior Basin
What is VHSv?
Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia (VHSv) is a deadly fish virus that has been recently detected in lower Great Lakes’ freshwater fish. It has not yet been found in Lake Superior. VHSv can infect a wide range of fish species and has been the cause of large fish kills in other parts of the Great Lakes. Great Lakes fish have no exposure history to VHSv and, therefore, are especially susceptible to the disease. In fact, according to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, there has not been a virus in the past that has affected so many fish species from so many fish families in the Great Lakes. VHSv does not pose a threat to human health.
What resources are at risk?
All waters within the Lake Superior basin are at immediate risk for VHSv introduction, including those of Isle Royale National Park, Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, Apostle Islands National Lakeshore, and the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Reservation, which contains the Grand Portage National Monument within its reservation boundaries. These parks contain some of the most productive fisheries in the basin and may include (at Isle Royale) unique morphotypes of lake trout.
VHSv can cause massive fish kills, catastrophically reducing important recreational opportunities, subsistence and commercial fish stocks; potentially destroying the morphotypes of lake trout at Isle Royale; and creating unpleasant conditions such as windrows of dead fish.
What is the focus of this Plan?
This plan is focused on (1) preventing contamination of the waters of the four units of the National Park System located in the Lake Superior basin and the Grand Portage Indian Reservation, (2) detecting the introduction of VHSv and (3) responding to VHSv detection and outbreaks. The plan will assist park and tribal managers, staff and cooperators in assessing the risk of VHSv introduction and, subsequently, planning and implementing the appropriate levels of prevention and monitoring actions for their area based upon that risk. The plan also provides a framework for response. Implementation of this plan will require close coordination with tribes; federal, state and provincial agencies and other organizations as they implement their own plans around the basin.
What happens if we do nothing?
There is the potential for catastrophic loss of species important for recreational, subsistence and commercial fishing opportunities, as well as potential impacts to prey species that could affect higher levels of the food web within Lake Superior. Any loss of stocks from the Apostle Islands area and Isle Royale could cause a loss of genetic material and valuable information that would compromise ongoing efforts to restore lake trout populations in the other Great Lakes. There is also a potential for loss of Isle Royale coaster brook trout populations from which eggs and milt are collected to create brood stock in hatcheries that enhance the overall sustainability of coaster brook trout populations and lake-wide restoration efforts. The plan identifies emergency response actions that are essential to implement prior to the beginning of the spring spawning, recreational fishing, and shipping seasons on Lake Superior in order to fulfill the resource protection mandates of the National Park Service and the Grand Portage Band.
What are the major elements of this plan?
This plan includes an analysis of the risks posed by the various pathways, or vectors, for transmission of the virus; a listing of known measures to prevent or contain the virus; an overall plan for the prevention of or response to the virus in the four National Park System units and the Grand Portage Indian Reservation and recommendations for enhancing cooperation with tribes, agencies and other organizations.
Emergency recommendations for the parks and the Grand Portage Band include an outreach campaign; boat decontamination; restrictions on the use of bait; and insuring that agency operations and practices do not spread the virus, including agency-controlled vessel ballast water. All of these actions will be implemented in close coordination and collaboration with the respective tribal and state regulatory agencies. Longer-term, non-emergency recommendations include research; enforcement of laws and regulations; collaborating with the US Coast Guard and the states and commenting on the development of their ballast water regulations; engaging with other stakeholders on aquatic invasive species prevention measures and the harmonization of regulations amongst agencies; conducting pre-infection fisheries assessments; and working with other stakeholders to conduct a detailed risk assessment.
What Are the Next Steps?
The National Park Service will request that the states impose emergency regulatory action to protect park fisheries resources. Should that not be possible in the emergency timeframe, the NPS and the Grand Portage Band will collaborate with the states but will act within their authorities. Consultation and collaboration will be essential elements of all efforts to prevent and respond to VHSv. As knowledge and technologies improve, actions will be evaluated and refined. We will only succeed at preventing VHSv in Lake Superior by recognizing that tribal, federal, state, and private interests must work in concert, and as rapidly as possible.
Download the complete plan: Emergency Prevention and Response Plan for Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia (2.08 pdf)
Emergency Restrictions to Prevent Spread of VHS at Apostle Islands National Lakeshore (44 kb pdf)
Map of Lake Superior Waters administered by Apostle Islands National Lakeshore (625 kb pdf)
Did You Know?
In his “Report on Apostle Islands National Park Project, January 20, 1931”, landscape architect Harlan Kelsey noted that “the hand of man has mercilessly destroyed the islands’ virgin beauty, and, therefore, a largely controlling element as outstanding national park material even if other reasons made them eligible…this project does not meet National Park Service standards.”